OK…. so I find it hard to understand how someone who abused their power of office can get off without even a slap on the wrist.
BUT
I also fail to understand how someone who has been FOUND GUILTY OF ETHICS VIOLATIONS BY ABUSING THEIR POWER OF OFFICE thinks that they have been exonerated?
Is it possible that Sarah Palin doesn’t know the meaning of the word “guilty”? That she doesn’t know what an ethical breach is?
We’re in the shitter folks, if McCain and Palin win.
Exit strategies for immigration, anyone?
A snippet from: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/10/12/politics/main4516113.shtml
“Despite the finding of a legislative report that she had broken the state’s ethics law in the scandal dubbed Troopergate, Alaska Governor Sarah Palin said Saturday that the report actually cleared her of any “legal wrongdoing or unethical activity.”" (italics and bolding are mine…)